Inspired by the latest post on Ben's blog I've decided to write about a subject I've been pondering for a while: why very good swimmers hang up their suits to dry permanently after their last collegiate swim meet, and why I (just a decent college swimmer) did not.
Let me begin with a short story: I was swimming phenom when I was young. I believe all my summer league records set when I was eight are still standing 20 years later. Pretty much every young swimmer dreams about going to the Olympics someday, and I was no different. But time passed and although I should have recognized it earlier, it wasn't until my senior year of high school that I realized I would never be Olympic material in swimming.
I went to Kenyon College in large part because of the opportunity there to reach both my swimming and running potential - I already had triathlon in the back of my mind. I could see myself becoming a great pro triathlete some day. But for my teammates on the swim team, swimming was their sole athletic pursuit. Undoubtedly, they all dreamed of going to the Olympics when they were younger, but those lofty goals had to be downgraded: now team and individual glory in Division III was what they worked for.
Anybody that hasn't swum competitively for a good program in their teenage and/or college years will have trouble grasping how hard swimmers work. The NCAA rules stipulate no more than 20 hours of training a week for collegiate athletes - a good college program will completely max-out those 20 hours with hard 2-a-day workouts. And trust me, it IS WORK. Somewhere along the line between age 10 and when college arrives, swimming changes drastically from a fun frolic in the water to a near-purgatorial experience where tedious, endless laps of pain may or may not be eventually rewarded come taper-time.
The team is what holds the individual swimmer together during the hard times. Everyone on the team goes through the suffering together and much deeper bonds between teammates are formed than any fraternity hazing could possibly create. There is also the fact that most college swimmers have been swimming for over 10 years - there is a strong desire to see their swimming career through to the end of college in order to justify all those early morning swim practices and weekends spent at swim meets in far-off cities.
Swimmers on good collegiate programs know that realistically, this is the best they will ever be at swimming. Soon after graduation they will have to find work - the idea of swimming the necessary two-a-days to improve themselves, without team support, is unimaginable for nearly everyone. And the idea of much lighter training, feeling the fitness and speed that you used to have in college slip away, never to be regained, is a similarly unbearable thought for any good collegiate swimmer who has worked so hard for so long to reach his/her potential.
And so nearly all of my teammates stopped swimming entirely after the final meet of their senior year, whereas I had seen that I could combine my decent swimming and running talent to succeed in a big way in the world of triathlon, and so I continued on. I've always had the goal of being the best at everything I do, and with triathlon, this is goal I can truly aspire to.
With my swimming background, I still have some of that mindset that ponders why anyone would put so much energy into a post-collegiate sport when they don't have the talent to be very good at it - isn't it just so much time and energy wasted?
But from the beginning I loved to run, and for a lot of my cross-country teammates in college, running was a way of life and a simple joy for about an hour a day. I didn't see them throwing out their running shoes at the end of their senior year. And as I continue through my triathlon career, the joy of biking and running has not diminished, even though some of it is hard work. Even swimming, now done in a much more moderate amount compared to earlier, can be enjoyable a lot of the time.
I am a pro triathlete for a lot of reasons: 1)I have the talent and desire to be the best 2) I have an extremely strong core of energy that needs to be spent on something - triathlon is perhaps the best way to expend this energy 3) there's a lot of cool people in the sport 4) I love challenging myself, and triathlon is a supreme mind and body challenge
But if I didn't love what I did for the simple joy of doing it, I would find something else. Now I can see why there are so many people dedicated to this sport not with any lofty first-place goals in mind...and finally, after a long time has passed since my collegiate swimming career ended, I am beginning to see why an ex-collegiate swimmer might wander back into the sport maybe 5-10 years later and start going to a few masters practices each week, no longer with the idea of being one's absolute best, but simply to enjoy the feel of the water, the camaraderie of good, like-minded people, and the satisfaction of accomplishing a challenging workout.
Ironman Coeur d'Alene RR, part 3
3 hours ago
8 comments:
I quit riding horses because for some reason I thought it would be fun to move from VA to san francisco.
At ten and eleven, my friends and I were planning how and when we'd ride in the Olympics.
At 14 I think I realized I wasn't going to the olympics - for one thing, in riding you have to have money and lots of it to even think of being at that level, or someone with money sponsoring you because you are phenomenally talented and the horses love you and would jump the moon for you.
But at 14 I also realized that I loved riding and loved the horses anyway, and even though I wasn't going to be the best in the world, that didn't affect my love of riding, or my desire to compete.
Same with pretty much any athletic endeavor for me. I'm not world champ material, or even national champ for that matter. But I can be Courtenay L. Brown champ material, i.e. the best i can be or whatever that militaristic rah rah rah commercial says.
this is a stupid comment. sorry.
I knew Courtenay and I must've had something else in common besides triathlon. I used to ride, too. I also had great visions of riding in prestigious shows and jumping 7 1/2' walls.
Then I realized there was no way THAT would ever happen because of the money thing (the closest to owning I got was leasing...ha...) and well, I was decent, but not the next young champ. I think that's still why I love descending on the bike so much...getting into that crouch reminds me of being in jump position. :)
ANYWAY, back to Greg's post, because this is after all, Greg's blog and it would be rude of me not to comment in response to his post. That was why I clicked 'comment' anyway - Courtenay just had a great remark that I couldn't pass up.
I really liked what you had to say. I swam master's swimming before I got into this tri stuff and heard a LOT of crazy swim stories from people who had been collegiate swimmers. It sounded miserable. I was glad I never went there.
Swimming in general is a hard-core sport. I think that's part of the reason I moved away from it, even in master's. I had friends who came back to it 10 years later and would work SO HARD in practices (and would swim 2x/day) just to make Nationals. It's like doing it all over again because the same people who didn't make it to the Olympics are now all battling each other in Masters. Crazy. Or they go the route of some of my other friends and become crazy long-distance swimmers who also work their butts off.
I tried to get into the long-distance thing but after doing Donner Lake (August - have you guys done that one? It's good fun! Not too cold, 2.7 miles, beautiful views) swim, I realized I'm not cut out for anything longer. Nor did I care to have swimming be my only sport.
Anyway, your post brought up other thoughts around why DO we do this if we're not all gonna be pro - it really comes down to the enjoyment factor, I guess. Like Courtenay said...being the best we can be and sometimes that means we win...sometimes not.
Hm. Now I ramble. Just an interesting subject...good thoughts.
Lots of good points. I love racing. I love to see how good I can be. And I have fun with it.
My story is similar to Greg's: I was an AMAZING 14 year old swimmer, but soon after that I lost my Olympic Dream to whatever it is in high school that teaches you to believe in limits (AP Calculus?).
There seems to be a lot of swimmers who quit after college, but pick it up again five to ten years later. I think it has to do with a burnout from the 20 (does anyone really get out after the 20th? That was probably Friday morning!) hours a week hardcore swimming.
I am afraid to ride horses.
Greg,
So I finally was able to articulate my other main point/question from your article. I was talking with a friend about it and it hit me...BAM...
You mentioned the burnout factor. Now, us lowly age-groupers - well we work hard and some of us work to follow a training plan that has us going 12-15 hours a week...all because we like it and I, personally, want to see how good I can be if I actually work off a real plan. Just for the sheer curiosity and fun of it.
But what about the pro aspect of being in this? Obviously that demands you be a little more serious about this sport than say, me. If I come up short on my weekly hours, I might yell at myself, but that's about it. So, given the intensity at which pro triathletes train - don't you think it ends up in the same boat as hard-core high school/college swimmers? That eventually, you might get tired of that, too?
Not that there's anything wrong with burnout or moving on from one sport to another. I guess I'm trying to understand how training at a really hard level with swimming is more of a burnout factor than say, being a pro triathlete and training at a really hard level.
Hmmm...
I'll stay in the sport as long as I can remain at the top of my game. Hopefully, this will be mid to late 30's. When I feel age catching up with me, I will retire from the sport and take up another challenge - one that's non-competitive like long-distance cycling or something.
certainly I don't see myself ever competing as an age-grouper in triathlons (mark my words, that will never happen). but it won't be burn-out. it's something quite different.
My swimming background is similar to y'alls in that I wasn't an Olympic Hopeful when I was in college... but different in that I was never a phenom at a younger age, either. The peak of my swimming career was becoming a mediocre distance swimmer at a solid Division-III program (Carnegie Mellon, Go Tartans!). But even at that level, I am quite sure that all of the "good" swimmers hung it up after senior year.
I suppose that I am still swimming and racing pro triathlons for some of the same reasons that Greg alluded to:
* ridiculously high energy level that must be devoted to something
* intrinsic joy of aerobic activity and going somewhere -- especially if outdoors but even if it has to be laps in a pool or on a track
* competitive drive that can't be applied as directly in the workplace
I want to address Sarah's comment on burnout, too, but I don't have a final answer so I'll just ramble instead. I am sort of a weird hybrid of age-grouper and pro: I have a "real job" at Microsoft where I use my Computer Science degree, but then I try to squeeze in enough training and recovery outside of work to compete at the elite level (18-21 hrs/wk). I sometimes feel like I'm on the edge of burnout but I often can't see myself doing anything else -- sport and technology are two things that I'm really into and am somewhat gifted at...
Sort of like Greg's "top of my game" comment, I think that I'll stick with the sport at this level as long as I continue to improve -- I am still in the "seeing how good I can be" phase, which may eventually force me to consider a different work+sport balance. I suppose that keeping my Day Job takes away a lot of the pressure to be the very best triathlete out there. I may not have the right mix of talents to be the best at triathlon or at work but I can tell myself that I am probably one of the best at both combined.
too bad there can't be some way of combining triathlon (or another similarly challenging aerobic sport) and a real job into some competion. Maybe for Chris, the race would be take care of some computer code THEN do a triathlon, then do something else computer-wise. or something like that. Loren might give Chris a good race in that type of race. I would finish last or DNF.
i've been thinking about what i commented on earlier, and I wonder if my competitive drive is too strong to completely drop out of organized sports. challenging myself by myself might not be enough.
It's such an interesting subject. I liked Greg's idea of combining things like work and sports. That would be way more fun. :)
I guess it's a tough topic, like Chris said, to address. Makes you want to ramble random thoughts about it. I think we all have different motivations for doing it.
I get kind of tired of being so regimented to a plan, which is the reason I brought up that question. But then it's sticking to the plan that brings so much satisfaction on race day where you REALLY perform well and you think "hot damn! That was AWESOME and I kicked some serious @$$!!! It was so worth it!" ...as opposed to all the times I half-trained and would do reasonably well and would be left thinking "wow, if only I had really stuck to a serious plan...I know I could've done better."
I think the funny thing for me is that I really found something I was good at, and in the absence of finding a career I've yet to be totally in love with, this has been something I could really be devoted to.
At the same time, it comes back to that original swimmer's conundrum, which is: "Okay, I have a few wins here and there, but I'm not going pro. So how long do I do this? What's the real driving force?" My guess is that I'll do it as long as I continue to enjoy it, and like Chris I think, as long as I can keep improving. The idea of continuously working to get better is also a pretty good driving force.
Oh, I've rambled on so long. It's just such a fun topic to discuss!
Post a Comment